Studies Addressing the Impact of Margins Status on Local Control in TLM for Glottic Cancer
Studies Addressing the Impact of Margins Status on Local Control in TLM for Glottic Cancer
Author | Patients | T Stage | Adequate Margin Definition | Use of Frozen Section | Inadequate or Positive Margins on Final Pathology | Further Treatment for Inadequate or Positive Margins (Number of Patients; Treatment) | Rate of Positive Pathology on Second Resection | Rate of Local Recurrence in Inadequate or Positive Margins | Rate of Local Recurrence in Negative Margins | Significant Impact of Margins Status on Local Control | Initial Local Control Rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fang17 (2013) | 75 | T1, T2 | NA | yes | I: 10 (10%) P: 28 (40%) |
none | 18% | 3% | no | 84% | |
Michel10 (2011) | 64 | T1 | 1–2 mm | no | 24 (37.5%) | 10; re-resection | 10% | 17% | 5% | no | 91% |
Peretti19 (2010) | 595 | Tis-T3 | >1 mm | no | 300 (50%) | 71; re-resection | 14% | 7%–15% | 6% | yes | 85% |
Ansain18 (2009) | 274 | Tis-T1 | >1 mm | no | I: 40 (15%) P: 54 (20%) |
28; RT 36; re-resection |
8% | 14% | 2% | yes | 91% |
Hartl9 (2008) | 79 | Tis-T1 | >2 mm | no | I: 20 (25%) P: 5 (6%) |
3; resection | 0 | 24% | 9% | no | 96% |
Manola11 (2008) | 31 | T1 | 1–2 mm | no | 3 (10%) | 3; resection | 0 | 3% | 0 | no | 95% |
Brondbo8 (2007) | 171 | T1 | 1–2 mm | no | 62 (36%) | none | 14.5% | 4% | no | 91% | |
Crespo20 (2006) | 40 | T1, T2 | NA | yes | P: 8 (20%) | 2; RT | 37.5% | 0 | yes | 93% |