Table 7.

Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Outcomes of Endoscopic Sphincterotomy (ES), Laparoscopic Common Duct Exploration (Lap.), and Laparo-Endoscopic Rendezvous Technique (Lap.-ES), 2011–2023.

Author Intervention Mean Age y (range or SD) Patients n Stone Clearance n (%)* Additional CBDI Needed (ES or Surg.) n (%) Complications n (%) Mortality n (%) Length of Hospital Stay d (mean or mean range) Author Conclusions
ElGeidie et al. (2011)53 ES 29.2 (20–67) 111 98/107 (91.6) 7/111 (6.3) 10/111 (9.3) 0 (0.0) 3.1 ES and Lap. safe and effective treatments for CBD stones
Lap. 32.5 (19–64) 115 104/110 (94.5) 9/115 (7.8) 8/115 (7.0) 0 (0.0) 2.2

Ferulano et al. (2011)54 ES 55±15 62 37/39 (95) Not given 6/62 (9.7) 0 (0.0) 3.5 Lap. avoids cholangitis, papillary stenosis, or pancreatitis after ES
Lap. 53±13 62 42/45 (93) Not given 4/62 (6.5) 0 (0.0) 7.1

Tzovaras et al. (2012)59 ES 69 (25–85) 49 39/49 (79.6) 1/49 (2.0) 6/49 (12.2) 0 (0.0) 5.5 Lap.-ES carries less hospital stay and lower amylase levels than ES
Lap.-ES 66 (22–87) 50 44/50 (88.0) 2/50 (4.0) 7/50 (14) 1/50 (2.0) 4

Koc et al. (2013)55 ES 54.9±17.9 54 51/54 (94.4) 1/54 (1.9) 6/54 (11.1) 0 (0.0) 6 Lap. has less morbidity and allows earlier recovery than ES
Lap. 51.5±16.6 57 55/57 (96.5) 0/57 (0.0) 4/57 (7.0) 0 (0.0) 3

Bansal et al. (2014)56 ES 45.1±15.1 84 73/83 (88.0) 16/84 (19.1) 19/84 (22.6) 3/84 (3.7) 5.3 Lap. has shorter hospital stays and needs fewer procedures
Lap. 43.0±13.7 84 77/84 (91.7) 10/84 (11.9) 20/84 (23.8) 0 (0.0) 4.6

Ding et al. (2014)57 ES 57.5±6.3 111 105/111 (94.6) 1/111 (0.9) 6/111 (5.4) 0 (0.0) NG Lap. is the treatment of choice for patients with CBD stones
Lap. 58.4±7.2 110 103/110 (93.6) 3/110 (2.7) 4/110 (3.6) 0 (0.0) NG

Sahoo et al. (2014)60 ES 48 (21–75) 41 29/41 (70.7) NG NG 0 (0.0) 10.9 Lap.-ES reduces pancreatitis, hospital stays, and interventions
Lap.-ES 48 (21–75) 42 38/42 (90.5) NG NG 0 (0.0) 6.8

Barreras González et al. (2016)61 ES 57.7 (20–84) 101 42/45 (93.3) Not given 6/101 (5.9) 0 (0.0) 3.1 Lap.-ES shows a higher rate of CBD stone clearance, a shorter hospital stay, and lower morbidity
Lap. 56.3 (22–87) 100 42/43 (97.7) Not given 2/100 (2.0) 0 (0.0) 2.1
Lap.-ES 58.4 (23–87) 99 45/46 (97.8) Not given 0/99 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1.2

Lv et al. (2016)58 ES 63.5±12.4 24 22/24 (91.7) 2/24 (8.3) 3/24 (12.5) 0 (0.0) 10.9 Lap.-ES resulted in a shorter hospital stay
Lap.-ES 61.3±14.5 29 28/29 (96.6) 1/29 (3.4) 1/29 (3.4) 0 (0.0) 6.7

Total ES 637 496/553 (89.7) 28/433 (6.5) 62/596 (10.4) 3/637 (0.5) 3.1–10.9
Lap. 528 423/449 (94.2) 22/366 (6.0) 42/528 (8.0) 0/528 (0.0) 2.1–7.1
Lap.-ES 220 155/167 (92.8) 3/79 (3.8) 8/178 (4.5) 1/220 (0.5) 1.2–6.8
* The denominators include the total number of patients entered into the trial, after excluding those with suspected but absent CBD stones.
† The denominators include the number of patients with available data.

CBDI, common bile duct interventions; d, day(s); NG, not given; y, year(s).

RMMJ Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal Rambam Health Care Campus 2024 April; 15(2): e0007. ISSN: 2076-9172
Published online 2024 April 28. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10521